A Private Check To See If Your Booking Process Quietly Attracts The Wrong People.
Some psychedelic retreat founders sense misalignment in how guests commit —
not enough to demand change, but enough to linger.
This page exists for those founders.
A Private Check To See If Your Booking Process Quietly Attracts The Wrong People.
Before people commit, they decide how safe it feels to decide.
We measure that—quietly, objectively, and without changing your work.
What Is A Pre-commitment Affordance Check?
The Pre-commitment Affordance Check is a private, one-off review of whether your current pre-booking experience supports certainty for the right guests — or introduces avoidable friction.
It is not advisory.
It is not strategic.
It is a judgment.
If nothing material is found, that is the conclusion.
01
Remain private by default
So your work is examined without exposure, signalling, or reputational risk.
02
Conclude cleanly, without escalation
So you are not pulled into an ongoing process, follow-ups, or implicit next steps.
03
Allow “no issue found” as a complete outcome
So correctness can be confirmed without needing to justify a change.
04
Reduce the need to explain or defend your standards
So authority stays with the work, not with repeated personal clarification.
05
Surface misalignment before it becomes visible
So interpretation is corrected quietly, not publicly.
What this is not
This is not:
- marketing
- lead generation
- funnels or copy
- optimisation or growth work
If you are looking to increase volume, reach, or visibility, this will not be useful.
Who this is for
This is for founders who:
- already operate with seriousness
- care more about alignment than scale
- are protective of reputation and peer standing
- prefer clarity over persuasion
- do not require encouragement to examine their work
You do not need help.
You may want confirmation.
Who should not do this
Do not request this check if:
- You're an early-stage or still experimenting
- You want reassurance or validation
- You expect advice, tactics, or direction
- You see reflection as optional in business operations
This is not designed to convince you of anything.
The risk this is designed to surface
The primary risk is not poor outcomes.
It is reputational erosion through misalignment.
Being misunderstood.
Being associated with the wrong narrative.
Attracting attention that dilutes intent.
This check exists to surface those risks before they become visible.
As Used By Joe
Discretion Is My Priority
That's why findings are shared in a private conversation.
No report. No deck. No pressure.
The outcome isn’t a plan.
It’s clarity.
Some founders move forward.
Many don’t.
Both outcomes are respected.
If this doesn’t resonate, feel free to ignore this page.
If it does, simply reply to my email or...
© 2023 All Rights Reserved